Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1922No. 6738PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO REFORM JUDGMENT.

May 24, 1922.

HAWKINS, Judge.

— The conviction of appellant was for a misdemeanor. Judgment was affirmed at a former day, and by the terms of the judgment in this court fees were taxed for the attorney general and the clerk of the court as provided for in Article 1164 and 1165, C. C. P. Execution issued against appellant and his sureties on his appeal bond therefor. Appellant has filed a motion asking that the execution heretofore issued be withdrawn, and that the judgment be reformed taxing the costs against appellant alone. Section 21, Acts First Called Session,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MuckenfussCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Braun v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Phipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API