Legal Opinion

Rudnick v. Rudnick

New York City Family Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaul Moskoff, J.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant to section 413 of the Family Court Act, for an order requiring the respondent, the former husband of the petitioner, to pay for the support of the child, now six years old, of the parties. The petitioner does not, in this proceeding, seek an order in her own behalf.

The petitioner’s approach to the proceeding Avas that of a de novo application, not relying upon the provisions of a separation agreement which was incorporated by reference into a subsequent Mexican bilateral divorce granted on July 19, 1965. The separation agreement, dated June 28, 1965,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Dyke v. Van DykeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kern v. KernNew York Family Court · 1970
  2. MacFadden v. MartiniNew York City Family Court · 1983
  3. Behren v. BehrenNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Torn v. TornNew York City Family Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API