Pullman Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtParker, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The exception to the refusal to strike the ease from the trial calendar at the June term is entirely without merit. It is true that defendant had thirty days after the filing of the petition and bond within which to file the certified transcript of the record in the clerk’s office; but the thirty days allowed for answering ran, not from the expiration of the thirty days allowed for filing the ‘transcript, hut from the actual filing thereof. Judicial Code, § 29 (28 USCA § 72). The defendant was allowed for answering the full thirty-day period after the filing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Goddard v. Grand Trunk RailwaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
- Dillingham v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Hogg v. PlantSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Williams v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Jane Doe v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Brabham v. Mississippi Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- United States v. MessingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.