Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Hynicka

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided September 13, 1906Published

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action to enjoin the treasurer of Hamilton county from collecting taxes on certain additions made by the auditor to the tax duplicate on property of plaintiff for the years 1891 to 1899, inclusive.

*346The cause was reserved to the general term for decision. The plaintiff is the lessee of the Cincinnati Southern Railway, a line built and owned by the city of Cincinnati. The road, as is well known, extends from the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, to the city of Chattanooga, Tenn. Under the lease of said road the lessees pay all the taxes. The agreement includes the years for which the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. People ex rel. DennisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API