Legal Opinion

Duran v. Judson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1973No. 47887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. At common law women labored under the disability of coverture and could not become either a surety or guarantor for another. By statute many states removed the contractual disability, with the result that women could enter into contracts of suretyship and guaranty with the same freedom as other contracts. 41 CJS 670 et seq., Husband and Wife, § 188. In Georgia from the time of the Married Woman’s Act (Ga. L. 1866, p. 146) to the amendment of Code § 53-503 (Ga. L. 1969, pp. 72, 73) women had the right to contract generally but not to enter into a contract of suretyship.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. SusmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Judson v. DuranSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Edwards v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API