Legal Opinion

Aira v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 5, 1992No. 78486PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have for review Aira v. State, 583 So.2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s use of a multiplier in calculating legal constraint points. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we disapproved the use of a multiplier and held that legal constraint points are to be scored once on the sentencing guideline scoresheet.

Accordingly, we quash the decision below to the extent that it conflicts with our decision in Flowers, and remand this case for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flowers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Aira v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API