Legal Opinion

State v. Reny

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

In consolidated appeals the State challenges two orders of the District Court, Portland, setting aside the defendants’ civil OUI adjudications on the ground that the civil OUI statute, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C (Supp.1984), was held to be unconstitutional in State v. Freeman, 487 A.2d 1175 (Me.1985). Both Donald Reny and Mark Breton were adjudicated for operating under the influence pursuant to the civil OUI statute prior to our decision in Freeman. Neither defendant appealed his conviction. Both filed motions pursuant to M.D.C. Civ.R. 60(b)(4) to vacate the adjudications after we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Wells v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. State v. HigginsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Maines v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wellman v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Chestnut v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  5. State v. ValliSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API