Legal Opinion

Salkil v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1987No. WD 38306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Following a jury trial, Salkil was found guilty of felonious restraint and rape and he was sentenced to consecutive terms of two and five years imprisonment, respectively. After an unsuccessful direct appeal, State v. Salkil, 659 S.W.2d 330 (Mo. App.1983), Salkil filed a Rule 27.26 motion. His motion was overruled following an evi-dentiary hearing and he now appeals. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

The facts of the underlying crime are set forth in our earlier opinion, Salkil, supra at 331-32, and they need not be recounted here.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State v. HelmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. Mike HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API