Legal Opinion

Stultz v. Locke

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 1, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court for Carroll County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

The appellees, plaintiffs below, were tenants of the •appellant of a certain mill with premises and a tract of *564land belonging thereto, and instituted this suit to recover-damages for the alleged breach by the appellant of his. covenant to keep in repair the mills and machinery, waterpower, and fencing on the premises.

The contract between the parties is contained in articles, of agreement, which wqre offered in evidence by the plaintiffs, but the defendant objected that they were inadmissible because of an alleged variance between them and the-contract, set out in the narr. The objection was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Middlekauff v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851
  2. Hutchins's Lessee v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1769

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Chesapeake Brewing Co. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  3. Clark & Stevens v. GerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Kennedy v. KiddCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API