Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. Cagle

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 2000No. 1990592Published

1DissentHooper, Chief Justice

I must respectfully dissent. I would grant certiorari review. Charles Cagle sue4 his employer, Brock & Blevins, Inc., seeking to recover workers’ compensation for injuries he had sustained on January 23, 1993. The facts of this case are set out in Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. Cagle, 775 So.2d 824 (Ala.Civ.App.1999), wherein the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court finding that Cagle had suffered a 100% loss of earning capacity and was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the on-the-job injury that is the basis of this case.

Section 25-5-58, Ala.Code 1975,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API