Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. Cagle
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentHooper, Chief Justice
I must respectfully dissent. I would grant certiorari review. Charles Cagle sue4 his employer, Brock & Blevins, Inc., seeking to recover workers’ compensation for injuries he had sustained on January 23, 1993. The facts of this case are set out in Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. Cagle, 775 So.2d 824 (Ala.Civ.App.1999), wherein the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court finding that Cagle had suffered a 100% loss of earning capacity and was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the on-the-job injury that is the basis of this case.
Section 25-5-58, Ala.Code 1975,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brock & Blevins, Inc. v. CagleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999