Legal Opinion

Humes v. Director, Missouri Department of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1995No. 66673PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Kimberly Diane Humes appeals a judgment affirming the Director of Revenue’s (hereinafter Director) decision to suspend her Missouri driving privileges after a trial de novo. She argues the following points on appeal: (1) the officers lacked probable cause to arrest her for driving while intoxicated; (2) the Director failed to demonstrate she was intoxicated and operated a motor vehicle; and, (3) the trial court erred in admitting a maintenance report for the breathalyzer machine since the Director failed to produce the same report in response to a discovery request. We affirm.

Pur…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Chinnery v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Gordon v. DIRECTOR, STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oughton v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATEMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. DonovanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Peeler v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Renfro v. Director of Revenue, StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Johnson v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API