Union B. & L. Ass'n v. McNally
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Mrmmingbr, J., Union, Action by Union B. & L. Association against R. Lindsay McNally. Plaintiff appeals on the following exceptions: “Because his Honor erred therein: 1. “In holding and deciding that the master could not split the loan evidenced by the six hundred ($600.00) dollars bond,- into two loans as he did; to wit, a loan of $400 as of date May, 1901, and a loan of $200 of date of the $600 bond; and sustaining defendant’s 2d and 4th exceptions to the report of…
Read the full summary
Before Mrmmingbr, J., Union, Action by Union B. & L. Association against R. Lindsay McNally. Plaintiff appeals on the following exceptions: “Because his Honor erred therein: 1. “In holding and deciding that the master could not split the loan evidenced by the six hundred ($600.00) dollars bond,- into two loans as he did; to wit, a loan of $400 as of date May, 1901, and a loan of $200 of date of the $600 bond; and sustaining defendant’s 2d and 4th exceptions to the report of the special master; and reversing the master in that particular. 2. “In holding' and deciding that the master in…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion, of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
This is an action by the plaintiff on three bonds executed by the defendant to the plaintiff, secured by a mortgage. Two- of the bonds were for two hundred dollars each, and the third was for six hundred dollars. The case was referred to the master, who made his report. There were no exceptions to the master’s report. After hearing argument, the presiding Judge made the following order:
“This matter comes before the Court upon exceptions filed by the defendant, to- the report of the special master herein.
“The special master was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Building and Loan Association v. McNallySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Lankford v. BullSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935