Legal Opinion

Pere v. Nuovo Pignone, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1998No. 97-30572PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

150 F.3d 477

Nancy G. PERE, on behalf of Marci Danielle Pere, on behalf

of Matthew Reed Pere, individually and on behalf

of her minor children, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NUOVO PIGNONE, INC., et al., Defendants,

Nuovo Pignone S P A, Defendant-Appellant,

Coppus Engineering; Tuthill Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-30572.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 1998.

Kevin Wade Trahan, Sonnier & Trahan, Abbeville, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Howard J. Daigle, Jr., Michael D. Fisse, Seale, Daigle & Ross, Covington, LA, Rudolph V. Pino, Pino & Associates, White Plains, NY, for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Arriba Limited v. Petroleos Mexicanos, A/K/A PemexCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Harold E. Straub v. A P Green, Inc., and Atlas Turner, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Pullman Construction Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Eckert International, Incorporated v. The Government of the Sovereign Democratic Republic of FijiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Magness v. Russian FederationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Patrickson v. Dole Food Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Vasura v. AcandsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Orient Mineral Co. v. Bank of ChinaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Gutch v. Federal Republic of GermanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API