Legal Opinion
Skwiersky v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided March 2, 1989No. Claims Nos. 72116, 72420, 72928, 73405, 73889, 74313, 74728, 75263, 75699 & 76236; Claim No. 72147PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Albert A. Blinder, J.
The defendant has moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the claims of both claimants.1 Messrs. Skwiersky and Hester, who are attorneys-at-law, appearing pro se, seek damages equal to their contributions to the New York State Employees’ Retirement System (hereinafter Retirement System) and to the Social Security System for various periods of time.
At the hearing of this motion,2 the court advised the parties hereto that it would construe the motions as applications for summary judgment by both sides and allowed additional time for further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Tango v. TulevechNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burns v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Sevillia v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boland v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1994