Suarez v. State

OPINION

Opinion by: TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.

A jury convicted George Suarez of burglary of a habitation and assessed punishment at 25 years confinement. We are asked to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and whether the trial court erred by not compelling the testimony of Suarez’s co-defendant. Finding the evidence sufficient and that the trial court did not err, we affirm the judgment.

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE

Suarez asserts the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. He contends the only evidence of his guilt was the…