Legal Opinion

Scalfi Co. v. State of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1903No. Motion No. 1093PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion for rehearing on an application for writ of error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Palo Pinto County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a motion for rehearing of an application for a writ of errr

The suit was brought in the name of the State for the use of Palo Pinto County to recover upon a liquor dealer’s bond. The jury found that there had been three breaches of the bond, and judgment was accordingly rendered against the obligors for the sum of $1500, with interest from the date of the judgment at 6 per cent per annum.

The motion is based upon a specification of two alleged fundamental errors. These specifications were not assigned in the application for the wr-it of error. The Courts of Civil…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. City of Santa Anna v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Town of Jacksonville v. McCrackenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. Heidelberg Amusement Club v. Mercedes Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API