Legal Opinion

Klein v. Borchert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1903No. Nos. 13,378—(61)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Douglas county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Searle, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to rescind a contract for the exchange of certain personal property, and for damages, in which plaintiff had judgment, from which defendants appeal.

The facts are as follows: It appears that plaintiff was the owner of a stock of goods, which he exchanged with defendants for a twenty-five horse power Robinson & Cary engine owned by them. Prior to this exchange plaintiff was involved in some litigation concerning the stock of goods, and defendant Borchert, who is an attorney at law, represented him as his attorney in such litigation; and, at the time of the exchange referred to, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tancre v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  2. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Garceau v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Mercer v. McHieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. In re JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API