Legal Opinion

U-Haul Company of Arizona v. Lee

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 22, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00082Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 U-Haul Company of Arizona, No. CV-20-00082-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Tammy Lee, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff U-Haul Company of Arizona filed this interpleader action hoping to 16 prevent a variety of separate tort suits that might be filed against it in Iowa, Texas, Arizona, 17 or elsewhere. The Supreme Court established in 1967 that U-Haul’s strategy is not an 18 appropriate use of the federal interpleader statute when potential tort claimants would 19 prefer to proceed elsewhere.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. New York Life Insurance v. DeshotelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc., Eldred W. Barnes and Vincent H. D. Abbey v. The National Hockey League, Northwest Sports Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Robert Lee v. West Coast Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. SymonevichCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API