Legal Opinion

Kleppinger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2012No. 2D09-481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

In 2006, Jireh Kleppinger moved, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), to correct an allegedly illegal departure sentence that the trial court imposed in 1997 for crimes he committed in 1996. He argues that the sentence imposed was in violation of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004); on an alternative ground, he added an argument for similar relief based on Graham v, Florida, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  5. Manuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Geter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. St. Val v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Reynolds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Braxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API