Legal Opinion
Armster v. United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1987No. Nos. 86-7354, 86-7362PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The proceedings in this matter thus far have involved a request by petitioners that we issue a writ of mandamus and a motion by the respondent that we vacate our original decision.1 Both the request and the motion were denied. See Armster v. United States District Court (Armster I), 792 F.2d 1423 (9th Cir.1986); Armster v. United States District Court (Armster II), 806 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir.1986). Now before us is petitioner’s motion for attorney’s fees, filed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. 5 U.S.C. § 504, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (1982).
I. Background
On June 12, 1986, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness Marcella M. Meyer Sue Gottfried v. Community Television of Southern California James L. Loper William J. Lamb U.S. Dept. Of Health, Education & Welfare Federal Communications Commission Corporation for Public Broadcasting Public Broadcasting Service California Public Broadcasting-Commission, Greater Los Angeles Council on Deafness, Incorporated, a California Nonprofit Corporation Marcella M. Meyer and Sue Gottfried, for Themselves & in Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Community Television of Southern California, Doing Business as Kcet, and Federal Communications Commission Department of Education, and Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Armster v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jose Rolando Escobar Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Arnie Rolf Braafladt v. The Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Southwest Marine, Inc., a Corporation v. Campbell IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Stephen C. PerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- The Honorable Keith M. Lundin v. L. Ralph MechamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Maurice Armster, Josefina Cabrales, Clarence Carnes, William Clark, Nina Gorio, Patricia McCoy Michael Romberg, Maverick Veasey, Joseph Walters v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, and City of Riverside, City of Los Angeles, City of Rialto, Terry Ford, Sherman Block, Sheriff of Los Angeles, Jeff Launi, Daryl Gates, Police Chief of City of Los Angeles, Robert Evans, Real Parties in Interest. Celine Rolerson, Dr. Mark Rolerson, M.D., Individually Dr. Mark Rolerson, M.D., as the Natural Father of Elizabeth Rolerson, a Minor v. United States District Court for the District of Alaska, and the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, Volkswagenwerk A.G., A/K/A Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, a Foreign Corporation and Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987