Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Beaverhead County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1945No. 8479PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHonorable F. Y. Watts, District Judge

(sitting in place of MR. JUSTICE ADAIR, disqualified), delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarded plaintiff for the recovery of money paid under protest as a tax upon the net proceeds of mines. It is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts and, so far as deemed pertinent, they are as follows:

That from 1881 to 1898 the Hecla Consolidated Mining Company was the owner of certain quartz mines at the head of Trapper Creek in Beaverhead County, and the owner and operator of a concentrating mill situated at Greenwood, on what was known as Everest Mill Site No.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. South Utah Mines & Smelters v. Beaver CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Conway v. FabianMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. MjeldeMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Clark v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. County of MusselshellMontana Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Darby Spar, Ltd. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hayes v. Alaska Juneau Forest Industries, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pfizer, Inc. v. Madison CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Tags Realty, LLC v. RunkleMontana Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API