Midas Muffler Shop v. Ellison
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKS, Judge.
The decisive question on this appeal is whether certain conduct by a collection agency and the emotional distress resulting therefrom is sufficient to impose liability in an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The facts are as follows.
In December of 1976, Leo and Phyllis Ellison had a muffler installed on their pickup truck at a Midas Muffler Shop. The bill was $178.50 and a check for that amount was issued to Midas by Phyllis Ellison. Midas attempted to cash the check but when it was returned for insufficient funds, Midas delivered it to Commercial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Cluff v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Turman v. Central Billing Bureau, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Norris v. Moskin Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Slocum v. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Gable v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Spratt v. Northern Automotive Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1996
- HM Hotel Properties v. Peerless Indemnity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Weiss v. Collection Center, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.