Legal Opinion

Barrett Line v. Alamo Chemical Transportation Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 11869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge:

Plaintiff’s cause of action arises from a collision between two towing vessels, the M/V MOLLY SMITH and the M/V CRECOW, at a bend near the forty-third mile of the Morgan City-Port Allen Canal. CRECOW had in tow a Barge M-611, of which plaintiff, The Barrett Line, was owner pro hac vice, and the barge was damaged in the collision. Plaintiff acted against both the Alamo Chemical Transportation Company, owner and operator of the MOLLY SMITH, and the Devall Towing and Boat Service, owner and operator of the CRECOW, to recover damages done to its barge.

FINDINGS…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Schooner Catharine v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. P. Dougherty Co. v. United States. P. Dougherty Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. Pure Oil Co. v. The Vessel M/V PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Illinois Constructors Corp. v. Logan Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API