Legal Opinion

Botkin v. Middlesboro Town & Land Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 19, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

CASE 88. — ACTION BY WILLIAM BOT.KIN AGAINST THE MI'DDLESBO'RO TOW1N & LANDS CO. Appeal from Bell Circuit Court. From the judgment William Botkin appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Burn am

Reversing.

On the 19th day of May, 1890, the Middlesboro Town Co., by general warranty deed, conveyed to M. V. Pigg a lot in Middlesboro, reserving a lien in the deed to secure the payment of three promissory notes for $187.50 each, due in one, two and three years, with interest from date. Afterwards, Pigg conveyed the lot to A. W. Smidt; and Smidt, on the 5th of September, 1890, conveyed it to the appellant, William Botkin by general warranty deed. Smidt’s deed to Botkin recited that he had assumed and agreed to pay these lien notes. The notes were assigned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berry v. GraddyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Dant v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  3. Bedford v. Bedford's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  4. Williams v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  5. Elliott v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. L. & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Yeiser v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Kendall E. Hansen, M.D. v. Charles A. Robert, M.D.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API