Legal Opinion
Morisky v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 23, 2000No. Civil No. 98-473PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court is the motion of Theresa Donahue Egler, Esquire, counsel for Defendant Public Service Electric and Gas Company (“PSE & G”), to compel the production of documents pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions, and for the reasons noted below, the defendant’s motion shall be GRANTED.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In this putative class action, the plaintiffs allege that their employer, PSE & G, im*421properly denied them overtime pay in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Sandoval v. American Building Maintenance Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Schiller v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Medical & Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. v. David M. OppenheimCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- David v. Signal International, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.