Legal Opinion
United States v. Folk
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 26, 1919No. 2131Published
In Equity. Suit by the United States against Minnie Folk, Charles Page, and others. On motion by defendant Charles Page to have a bond discharged.
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
In Folk v. U. S., 233 Fed. at page 193, 147 C. C. A. 199, Sanhorn, Circuit Judge, for the court, said:
“However, this litigation presents claims of some of the parties which have not been material to the decision of the question whether or not the receiver was rightly appointed and the injunction rightly issued [italics mine], the defendants have offered to give a sufficient bond to protect all parties in interest during the pendency of this suit, and the court is of the opinion that it is wise and equitable to accept and require such a bond. The order of the court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Ex Parte RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Richter v. Estate of LeibyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Callahan Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916