Legal Opinion

Oakley v. Aspinwall

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1851PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the superior court of the city of New-York, where the action was on a bond executed by the defendants to [516] the plaintiff, dated January 10, 1838, according to § 55 of the statute concerning attachments against non-resident debtors. (2 B. S. 12.) The plaintiff had obtained an attachment against John "W. Baker and John Young as non-resident debtors, and the bond in question was given in order to procure a discharge of such attachment.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the superior court of the city of New-York, where the action was on a bond executed by the defendants to [516] the plaintiff, dated January 10, 1838, according to § 55 of the statute concerning attachments against non-resident debtors. (2 B. S. 12.) The plaintiff had obtained an attachment against John "W. Baker and John Young as non-resident debtors, and the bond in question was given in order to procure a discharge of such attachment. It was conditioned that the obligors therein would pay the amount justly due and owing by said Baker and Young, “ on account of any debt claimed…

1Opinion of the Court

Bronson, Ch. J.

The plaintiff applied for and obtained the attachment on a petition and affidavit sworn to by him, stating that Baker & Young were indebted to him in a specified sum of money “ arising upon a certain judgment” against them in his favor. Baker got the attachment discharged on giving a bond, with a condition to pay the amount justly due by Baker & Young to the plaintiff “ on account of any debt so claimed and [518] sworn to by him.” This is an action on the bond ; and one question is, whether the plaintiff has proved that he had a debt against Baker & Young “ arising upon a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Starbuck v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Jackson ex dem. Simmons v. ChaseNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. Steel v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Mervin & Goldsmith v. KumbelNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Carman v. TownsendCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rigney v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Blackburn v. SweetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Ratchford v. Covington County Stock Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Nolan v. McNameeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lane v. SalterThe Superior Court of New York City · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API