Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Tienken

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 31, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

After providing for a residuary trust for his widow by paragraph fifth of his will deceased directed that upon her death or remarriage two funds — each of $10,000 — were to be set apart for the income benefit respectively of his brothers, Louis and Carsten, and then gave all that was left of the remainder of the widow’s residuary trust to a nephew. Deceased died on April 17, 1922. He was predeceased by the nephew just referred to. He was survived by each of his brothers. His widow survived unmarried until January 7, 1941, when she died. The secondary trusts never came into…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Underwood v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Greenland v. . WaddellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Rockland-Rockport Lime Co. v. . LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. In Re the Will of GiffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Accounting of Esther C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API