Legal Opinion

Churchill v. Emerick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Relators apply for a mandamus to compel respondent to set aside a verdict and grant a new trial for misconduct of a jury after retiring to consider their verdict.

The jury were charged in the latter part of the day, and were out all night. While out, they sent the bailiff in charge for beer, of which he brought and they consumed several bottles. In the morning, the court, without objection from counsel, allowed them to go under charge of an officer to get breakfast at a hotel, and gave them proper cautions against communicating with others. But it appears from admitted facts that while in the…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People v. SchramMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API