Legal Opinion
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 29, 2008No. CV 03-0597-PHX-MHMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.
Following a jury verdict for Plaintiffs, Bard Peripheral Vascular and David Gold-farb, M.D. (“Plaintiffs”), in this patent infringement case involving United States Patent No. 6,436,135 (the “'135 patent”), W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.’s (“Gore” or “Defendant”), inequitable conduct claims were tried to the Court during a bench trial that occurred on December 7, 11, and 12, 2007. Since that time, the parties have filed post-trial briefs, including proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and have presented oral argument. After considering the trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015