Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Moritz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 2, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

The petitioner in a discovery proceeding originally sought to examine one of the executors, Samuel J. Moritz, in his representative and individual capacities by notice of examination. The respondent moves to vacate the notice of examination, asserting among other things, that the petitioner failed to proceed, in the first instance, by notice of motion as required where a witness is to be examined (see Augenblick v. Augenblick, 203 Misc. 360; Shoreham Operating Corp. v. Peyster, 7 Misc 2d 100). The petitioner now by way of a cross notice of motion seeks the relief initially…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Bartlett v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Reif v. GebelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of BuonoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API