Legal Opinion

In Re the Claim of Brooks

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The notice of hearing, though falling short of the sort of specificity that is desirable, did, under the circumstances of this case, "set forth the facts in sufficient detail to enable [claimant] to prepare his defense” (1 Cooper, State Administrative Law, pp 284-285). Thus, while the initial local office’s determination was based upon claimant’s insubordinate behavior on Friday, September 28, 1973, and the appeal board premised its ultimate decision on his failure to report to work the next day, the record as a whole makes clear that both were part of the continuum of related…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of FraekornNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. In re the Claim of FraekornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HerwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Ector v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re the Claim of LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. In re the Claim of ZayasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API