Legal Opinion

Lantry v. Mede

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Albert Mede, from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 5th day of March, 1908, reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of Manhattan, in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 18th day of Hovember, 1907. '

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The question in this case was submitted to the Municipal Court upon an agreed statement of facts upon which a judgment was directed for the defendant which has been reversed by the Appellate Term (58 Mise. Eep. 221). Section 780 of the charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466) provides : “ It shall be the duty of a marshal or his officers and agents, when authorized by him in writing so to do, to enter into any building or premises within said city for the purpose of examining, or causing to be examined, the stoves and pipes thereto, ranges, furnaces and heating apparatus of every kind…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Lantry v. HoffmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
  3. United States v. IrwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1851

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Browning v. AdamsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. In re the Estate of GallatinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  3. Auchincloss v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Brennan v. George L. Walker Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919
  5. People ex rel. Childs v. KnottNew York Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API