Legal Opinion

Megizsky v. Salen

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 21, 1968No. 184380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of contract wherein the plaintiffs, Megizsky and Brunell, co-partners doing business as Megizsky Electrict Company, seek to recover for work and materials furnished by the plaintiffs in a store in Longmeadow, Massachusetts known as Lucky’s Inc.

The declaration of the plaintiffs was as follows :

“The plaintiffs, RAYMOND MEGIZSKY and LEONARD L. BRUNELLE, co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of MEGIZSKY ELECTRIC COMPANY, say that the defendant, NORMAN RONALD SALEN, is an individual, now or formerly doing business under the name and style of ADAMS HOME…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Barttro v. Watertown Square Theatre, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Russo v. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Loftus v. LaufMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaps, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  2. Lechiara v. AmatoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Photiou v. Del SordoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Black v. HaarMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Heuler Tile Co. v. SperosMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API