Legal Opinion

Morales v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 15, 2008No. 06-16858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Claimant Debra M. Morales (“Morales”), a diabetic suffering from several attendant illnesses, sought disability benefits and supplemental security income. An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found Morales “not fully credible” and denied benefits. The district court affirmed.

Morales raises several issues on appeal. First, she argues that the ALJ erred by failing to ask a Vocational Expert to determine whether she had worked as a receptionist. The ALJ determination, however, was supported by substantial evidence and nothing suggests a need for a Vocational Expert.

Second, Morales…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Bunnell v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Anne J. Holohan v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissionerof SsaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Carmen Celaya v. William S. Halter, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cracolici v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  2. Mia Antuna v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API