Legal Opinion

Snipes v. Snipes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1995No. 925DC1301Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred by denying her motion to adjust and increase the amount of defendant’s monthly child support obligation. We disagree.

Pertinent facts and procedural information are as follows: Plaintiff Linda Lashley (Linda) and defendant John Snipes (John) were previously married and had one child,.John R. Snipes, Jr. (Jr.), born 17 March 1981. The parties eventually separated, entering into a “Separation Agreement and Property Settlement” (the Agreement) on 19 February 1987. Linda was given primary custody of Jr., and John agreed to pay the sum of $523.00…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Ottway Burton, PA v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of StampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. First Union National Bank of North Carolina v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API