Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Botanical Gardens v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 30, 1976No. 48337Published

1ConcurrenceEngland, Justice

I concur with the majority in reversing the Industrial Relations Commission. Section 440.15(6)(f), Florida Statutes (1975), does not require an award of dual benefits in this case, as the Commission has ordered and respondents now contend. The “scheduled” benefit prescribed for a hernia operation, which guarantees an injured party an ample period of recovery from this particular operation, may be appropriate in conjunction with unscheduled permanent disability benefits,1 but it is incompatible with temporary disabilities benefits which are required to be paid during the employee’s “healing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corral v. McCrory CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Market v. LutzSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API