Legal Opinion
Lashin v. Corcoran
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 23, 1959PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMellitz, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action to recover damages for injuries received by the wife, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, when she was struck by an automobile operated by the named defendant. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff sustained permanent injuries as a result of that defendant’s negligent operation of his car and was herself free from contributory negligence. The facts found amply support these conclusions, and no corrections which will advantage the defendants may be made in the finding.
The only claimed error requiring discussion is the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Johnson v. Charles William Palomba Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Roth v. ChatlosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Dempsey v. City of ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Woschenko v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- United Aircraft Corp. v. International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.