Legal Opinion

Polk v. Almindinger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1922No. 8225PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

This suit was brought hy appellee against appellant to recover damages for the alleged breach by appellant of a contract of sale of personal property by ap-pellee to appellant. The following sufficient general statement of the pleadings and of the questions presented by the appeal is copied from appellant’s brief:

“By the terms of the contract, Almindinger was to deliver to Polk certain' live stock and other chattels of the total valuation of $5,090.37, in consideration of which Polk was to pay $600 in cash, assume certain indebtedness amounting to $1,490.37, including accrued interest, and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell & Mitchell v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Caswell v. J. S. McCall SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. West Texas Utilities Co. v. NunnallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Southwestern Cooperage Co. v. KivlenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Smith v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API