Legal Opinion

In re C.J.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 16, 2005No. 2-04-250-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant C.J.M. pled true and was adjudicated delinquent based on his aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. Because he was subject to a determinate sentence, he elected to have a jury decide his disposition.1 The jury assessed his disposition at ten years’ commitment in the Texas Youth Commission with a possible transfer to the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,2 and the trial court entered an order of commitment accordingly. Appellant brings one point on appeal, contending that the trial court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CJMCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. In the Matter of J.R. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2023
  3. in the Matter of X.J.T., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API