Legal Opinion

Hodges v. McCullom

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1941No. Civ. No. 6540PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries, medical expenses, and damages to the automobile of plaintiff. After trial by the court, findings were entered in favor of respondent, and judgment for $1276.40 entered against defendant, who now appeals therefrom.

There are, in reality, only two grounds urged for reversal, although they have been subdivided into six by appellant. The first is the insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings, and the second is that the damages are excessive.

Taking up the first ground, it appears that the collision resulting in the injuries was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frediani v. OtaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Zwerin v. Riverside Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API