Legal Opinion

Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 22, 1975No. 72-1073PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The court remanded to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, respondent, the case then before us involving the validity of the stationary source standards 1 he had promulgated 2 under section 111 of the Clean Air Act3 for new or modified portland cement plants. Portland Cement Association v. Ruckelshaus, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 308, 486 F.2d 375 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 921, 94 S.Ct. 2628, 41 L.Ed.2d 226 (1974). Some of the matters the court then reviewed on the petition of the Portland Cement Association we concluded required further consideration and clarification, hence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. National Asphalt Pavement Ass'n v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  4. Friends of the Earth v. Potomac Elec. Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API