Legal Opinion

Gillick v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The defendant appeals from two judgments of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, third district, rendered in favor' of the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

By stipulation two actions were tried together. The plaintiff in the first action sues to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while she was a passenger on one of the defendant’s trains. The plaintiff in the second action is the husband of the plaintiff in the first action, and sues to recover damages for the loss of his wife’s services resulting *431from the same accident. Both plaintiffs recovered judgments, and the sums awarded to the plaintiffs are conceded to be reasonable if the defendant is liable.

The plaintiff in the first action, while a passenger on one of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. . Consolidated Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Naylor v. Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API