Legal Opinion

Bloomberg v. Marks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1975No. 75-37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The plaintiff, Marty Bloomberg, filed suit against defendant, Arthur M. Marks, on March 15, 1974, alleging a 7-year-old breach-of-contract action. Marks was a mortgage broker and Bloomberg’s claim was that Marks had promised to obtain financing for him, for a contingent fee of $4800, but no financing was ever obtained. The plaintiff admitted that Marks had returned $2400 to him in the form of a cashier’s check but stated that he had never cashed it. In the answer filed by Marks, he denied that there was a contract as alleged and denied that there had been any breach. Marks additionally filed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Plumb v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Stanley v. ChastekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. A. S. Schulman Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Wielander v. HenichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. A. S. Schulman Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koch v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Gilliland v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API