Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Riggs National Bank

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 17, 1968No. Civ. A. 2107-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SIRICA, District Judge.

Plaintiff, settlor and life beneficiary of an irrevocable trust, seeks to modify its terms. 1 Such trusts may be modified provided the settlor and all beneficiaries consent. 2 The heirs of the settlor comprise the remaining beneficiaries. 3 Plaintiff cannot obtain the consent of all the beneficiaries because her heirs cannot be ascertained until her death. At an earlier point in this litigation plaintiff sought to obtain relief by arguing that, applying the doctrine of worthier title, she was the settlor and sole beneficiary, and therefore the terms of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Doctor v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. O'GRADY v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. In re the Guardianship of Baby K.New York Surrogate's Court · 2001
  4. Wainwright v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API