Legal Opinion

Hungerford v. Mathews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1987No. 4-86-1131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

A plaintiff sought damages for a knee injury sustained in an automobile accident. During the trial, evidence was adduced from a Florida doctor to support the theory that the injury was attributable to a prior boating incident. This evidence emanated from the plaintiff's medical history compiled by the treating physician in Massachusetts. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff believes that the admission of that evidence, to which he objected, was reversible error. We disagree and affirm.

The principal case on which the injured plaintiff relies is Saul v. John…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Wesley Leon HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Bender v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Saul v. JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MacARTHURDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Gomez v. CouvertierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erwin v. ToddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Department of Corrections v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Kurynka v. Tamarac Hosp. Corp., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API