Legal Opinion

Bandler v. Town of Woodstock

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 29, 2020No. 19-4334Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-4334 Bandler v. Town of Woodstock UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. John C. Norton v. Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. St. Pierre v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Terry v. Incorporated Village of PatchogueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API