Legal Opinion

Paul v. Nance Buick Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1972No. 6269PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Justice.

This is an appeal from a suit alleging conversion of an automobile owned by Appellant. Appellees filed a cross-action alleging “mechanic and materialman’s liens as established under Article 16 of the Constitution of the State of Texas and Article 5452 of the Revised Civil Statutes of the State of Texas.” Upon trial before the Court, judgment was rendered that Appellant recover nothing in his suit for conversion, and that Appellees recover the sum of $162.45 which was the amount owed Appel-lees by Appellant for repair work performed on Appellant’s automobile. We reverse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. McBride v. BeakleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. White v. Texas Motor Car & Supply Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Texas Hydraulic & Equipment Co. v. Associates Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Christian v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garcia v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Stone v. Crown Diversified Industries Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Clifton v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Atlas Amalgamated, Inc. v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. City of Dallas v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API