Star-Telegram, Inc. v. Walker
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GONZALEZ, Justice.
The issue before us in this mandamus proceeding is whether a trial court may issue a protective order to prohibit a newspaper from publishing information already disclosed in open court and made part of a trial court’s public record. We hold that the trial court’s protective order violates article I, section 8 of the Texas Constitution, because it unreasonably restricts expression by preventing the dissemination of public information. This constitutes a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court for which there is no adequate remedy at law. We thus conditionally…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ex Parte FosterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Operation Rescue-National v. Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Cain v. Hearst Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.