Cox v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In denying appellant’s motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, the trial court ruled that “the defendant cannot establish he was erroneously misled or that he received ineffective assistance” of counsel in the form of advice he received concerning provisional credits, advice that the decision in Gomez v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 499, 508 (Fla.1998) later proved, he alleged, had been erroneous, saying:
Indeed, under Gomez, the defendant appears to be entitled to all awardable provisional credits as a Group V offender as specified in such decision, i.e., those not awarded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gomez v. SingletarySupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Mayes v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Winkler v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sink v. Emerald Hill Owners Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005